Niagara 4 is one of the leading building management systems, known for its flexibility and scalability. Its operational efficiency makes it a popular choice for large and medium facilities looking for comprehensive and reliable automation solutions.
However, Niagara 4’s reliance on the Internet for email alerts or app-based alerts, can pose challenges, particularly in offline/isolated environments or during Internet outages. In this article, we will examine these limitations and demonstrate how integrating an SMS & voice solution like SMSEagle can provide reliable communication in emergency situations.
Alarm Classes and Priorities: Niagara 4 allows you to categorize alarms and assign priorities to them. Each alarm class can be configured with different notification and escalation procedures.
Alarm Sources: Alerts can be triggered from various sources such as sensor data, point values (e.g., temperature, humidity), or any system abnormality that crosses pre-set thresholds.
Alarm Routing: Alarms can be routed to different recipients or destinations based on severity or other factors. These destinations could be local displays, email, SMS, or more.
Alarm Handling:
Alarm Journals: Niagara 4 keeps an alarm history in an Alarm Journal where you can review past alarms and their status (e.g., acknowledged, cleared).
Notification Channels: Alerts can trigger notifications through various channels:
There are several limitations associated with using email and on-site interface alerting in a system like Niagara 4. These limitations can affect reliability, response times, and operational efficiency. Here’s an overview of the potential challenges:
Internet Dependency: Email alerts require internet access or a mail server connection. If the internet connection is down or slow, email notifications can be delayed or entirely undelivered.
Delivery Delays: Emails are not instant and can be delayed by factors such as mail server load, spam filters, or network congestion. This could be problematic for urgent alarms.
Email Spam Filters & No Guaranteed Receipt: Some alarms might be marked as spam by the recipient’s email server, leading to alerts being missed. Proper configuration of email servers and whitelisting is required to avoid this. There is no way to ensure the recipient reads the email. Someone could miss the notification in a crowded inbox or ignore it. Email does not guarantee real-time responses to critical alarms.
Lack of Immediate Action & Limited Follow-up Actions: Emails are passive notifications. The recipient has to check their email regularly or have push notifications enabled to be aware of the alarms. This may not be suitable for critical, time-sensitive alerts. Once an email alert is sent, there is no built-in mechanism to track whether the alarm has been addressed, acknowledged, or escalated unless you integrate an external system to track responses.
Vulnerable to Cyber Threats: Emails can be susceptible to cyber attacks such as phishing, which could compromise the integrity of the alarm system if the email account is accessed maliciously.
Physical Presence Required: On-site interfaces (like HMIs or control panels) require on-site staff to be physically present before control panel to view or acknowledge the alarm. If personnel are not present in the immediate area, they may not receive the alarm in time, particularly if there are multiple facilities or large sites
Single Point of Failure: If the on-site interface fails or experiences power outages, no one will be able to receive or respond to the alarm notifications. Without redundancy, this creates a risk for important alarms being missed.
Limited Customization: On-site interfaces may have limited capabilities for customizing notifications or escalations. For example, they may not support more complex alarm workflows or integrating advanced alert management systems without additional configuration.
Visual-Only Notifications: Most on-site interfaces are primarily visual. They may not have robust audio alarms or mobile push notifications, which can reduce their effectiveness in getting immediate attention during emergencies.
Capacity Limits: Some interfaces may have limitations on how many active alarms they can display at once, which could cause important alerts to be buried if there’s a flood of alarms or multiple concurrent events.
For a robust alerting system, combining both methods with other mechanisms (e.g., SMS, voice calls) can help mitigate these limitations and ensure timely and effective alarm management.
Building a comprehensive alerting solution for Niagara 4 should include built-in alarm features and complement them with SMS and/or voice alerts. It will allow significantly improving response times and ensure critical alarms reach the appropriate personnel quickly. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to implement such a solution:
Niagara 4 already has a robust alarm and alerting system, so the foundation is in place. However, to add SMS and voice alerts, you’ll need third-party integrations or services. Let’s break down the components:
To integrate SMS and voice alerts, you may use third-party online service or offline hardware solution. Consider using a hardware SMS gateway if you want to be sure that your system will work even if Internet connection fails or if you have offline/isolated environment. Niagara Marketplace is a comprehensive source of drivers and add-ons suitable for your system.
When selecting the right alerting system, consider the following key factors:
SMSEagle devices enable the integration of a complementary SMS and voice notification system into Niagara 4. What do you gain:
SMSEagle is a hardware & software solution that guarantees a swift delivery of your messages to designated recipients, whether it’s for notifications, alerts, or important updates.
The causes of internet dependency in building automation systems can be attributed to several factors:
Integration with third-party vendors: The need to integrate building systems with third-party vendors, such as energy management systems or security systems, has driven the adoption of internet-dependent solutions. This integration allows for a more comprehensive approach to building management, where various systems work together seamlessly to optimize performance and efficiency.
Increased scalability: Internet-dependent solutions have enabled building systems to scale more easily, making it possible to integrate new devices and systems as needed. This scalability ensures that building automation systems can grow and adapt to changing requirements without significant disruptions.
Integrating SMSEagle with Niagara 4 significantly enhances communication capabilities by providing SMS & voice notifications that are fast, reliable, and accessible, particularly in emergencies or during network outages. SMSEagle enables fast communication, automated reports, and multi-recipient alerts, ensuring Niagara 4 users can efficiently manage and monitor their building systems. This integration adds layers of reliability, flexibility, and accessibility, especially in remote locations or mission-critical environments.
SMS is quick, universal, and effective — and when paired with a dedicated hardware SMS gateway, it becomes a powerful tool for secure, large-scale communication.
At SMSEagle, we deliver reliable SMS gateways businesses depend on. We know true trust demands uncompromising information security. That’s why we’re proud to announce our ISO 27001 certification, the globally recognized standard for Information Security Management Systems (ISMS).
We’d like to announce that SMSEagle software version 6.14 is now available. This update brings several useful improvements, along with important fixes that make sure your device works even better.
